Prediction of Aidan Kim [637th] vs Eric Hadigian [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W W W L
Form
W W L L W L L L L LH2H: Kim 1 - 0 Hadigian
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim winning 2 and Hadigian winning 0. The last match between Kim and Hadigian was at the M25 Louisville, 09-10-2024, First, Hard with Aidan Kim getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aidan Kim | 1 |
| Eric Hadigian | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Aidan Kim
Player
Eric Hadigian
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:19:0 | Average Match Time | 1:19:0 |
| 70% (33/47) | 1st Serve % | 63% (33/52) |
| 79% (26/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (21/33) |
| 57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (5/19) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (26/52) | Return Points Win % | 28% (13/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Aidan Kim vs Eric Hadigian Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Hadigian
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 40.96% of points on their second serve, while Hadigian has won 25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 47.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hadigian has won 22.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.63% and 8.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 47.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hadigian has saved 37.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 75% of matches played (W/L 27/ 9), with Hadigian winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 28/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hadigian has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 47/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.14% of matches (W/L 27/ 8), where as Hadigian has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 12/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kim winning 1 times and Hadigian being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim winning 2 and Hadigian winning 0. The last match between Kim and Hadigian was at the M25 Louisville, 09-10-2024, First, Hard with Aidan Kim getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kim and Hadigian have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kim winning 0 times and Hadigian 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kim winning 0, and Hadigian 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.19 while Hadigian has played against players with an average rank of 340.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hadigian has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 20.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hadigian has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Aidan Kim vs Eric Hadigian Best Odds For The Match
Aidan Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
40%
(
22 of
55)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Samir Banerjee
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
59
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
William Jansen
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Rodrigo Fernandes
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Aidan Kim
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Giulio Perego
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Ezekiel Clark
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Eric Hadigian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Eric Hadigian
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dhakshineswar Suresh
Player
Eric Hadigian
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Eric Hadigian
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alp Horoz
Player
Eric Hadigian
79%
(
66 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Story
Player
Eric Hadigian
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Hadigian
Player
Garrett Johns
69%
(
76 of
110)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
45 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Eric Hadigian
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Eric Hadigian
68%
(
71 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-1 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Hadigian
Player
Vincent Rettke
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(3) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Kim vs Hadigian?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Kim Vs Hadigian is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (53/38) | Win/Loss | 57% (47/35) |
| 58% (121/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (102/80) |
| 52% (1065/979) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (895/812) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 369 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 247 | Total Double Faults | 58 |
| 1:35:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 412.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 255.99 |
| 63% (3537/5633) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1332/2151) |
| 68% (2391/3537) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (837/1332) |
| 50% (1041/2096) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (392/819) |
| 42% (235/564) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (77/184) |
| 41% (2255/5559) | Return Points Win % | 39% (782/2030) |
| 60% (53/89) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (45/79) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 69% (18/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (8/19) |
| 54% (14/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (9/18) |
| 89% (53/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (46/39) |
| 11% (53/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (46/7) |
| 18% (38/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (35/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
